NASA’s Lunar Trailblazer mission has officially come to a close, after the agency confirmed it was unable to re-establish contact with the small satellite designed to study water on the Moon.
Artist's impression of NASA’s Lunar Trailblazer
Launched on February 26, the Lunar Trailblazer spacecraft successfully separated from a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket about 48 minutes after liftoff from Kennedy Space Center. The mission flew as a rideshare on Intuitive Machines’ IM-2 lunar lander, part of NASA’s push to deliver cost-effective science through ride-along opportunities.
Initial contact with the spacecraft was made at 8:13 p.m. EST the day of launch by mission operators at Caltech’s IPAC center in Pasadena, California. But less than 24 hours later, communication was lost—and despite months of global recovery efforts, contact was never regained.
Mission Goal: Map Lunar Water in Unprecedented Detail
Lunar Trailblazer was a high-risk, high-reward mission aimed at creating high-resolution maps of water on the Moon’s surface—identifying not just where water exists, but in what form, how much, and how it fluctuates over time. Such data would have been invaluable for future human and robotic lunar missions, commercial operations, and for advancing scientific understanding of water on airless planetary bodies across the solar system.
The spacecraft carried two main science instruments:
- HVM3 (High-resolution Volatiles and Minerals Moon Mapper), built by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), designed to detect water and mineral signatures.
- Lunar Thermal Mapper (LTM), developed by the University of Oxford and funded by the UK Space Agency, aimed to measure lunar surface temperatures and rock compositions.
The Problem: Power Loss and Deep-Space Drift
Limited data received in the first hours of the mission revealed a critical issue: the spacecraft’s solar panels were not properly oriented toward the Sun. This misalignment likely caused the onboard batteries to drain, disabling the satellite's ability to transmit or perform maneuvers.
NASA and its international partners—including radar and optical observers around the world—spent months trying to reacquire contact. Observations showed Lunar Trailblazer had entered a slow spin and was drifting farther into deep space. Teams hoped the changing geometry might eventually allow the solar panels to catch sunlight, recharging the batteries enough to reboot the radio system. However, as the spacecraft moved farther away, even a potential signal would have been too faint to detect or command.
“At NASA, we undertake high-risk, high-reward missions like Lunar Trailblazer to find revolutionary ways of doing new science,” said Dr. Nicky Fox, associate administrator for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate. “While it was not the outcome we had hoped for, missions like this help reduce risk for future small spacecraft.”
Mission leaders echoed the sentiment, acknowledging disappointment but emphasizing the mission's contributions to future lunar science.
“We’re immensely disappointed that our spacecraft didn’t get to the Moon, but the two science instruments we developed, like the teams we brought together, are world class,” said Dr. Bethany Ehlmann, the mission’s principal investigator at Caltech.
One silver lining is that the HVM3 spectrometer’s design will live on in a future Moon mission. A JPL-built clone, the Ultra Compact Imaging Spectrometer for the Moon (UCIS-Moon), has already been selected for a new NASA flight opportunity and will provide the highest-resolution data yet of surface water and minerals.
Lunar Trailblazer was selected under NASA’s SIMPLEx (Small Innovative Missions for Planetary Exploration) initiative, which funds low-cost, high-risk space science missions. These projects typically ride along with larger missions to reduce launch costs, but also come with fewer safety nets and looser oversight.
Mission roles were split across several institutions. Caltech/IPAC led operations and science planning, NASA JPL handled engineering, navigation, and built the HVM3 instrument, Lockheed Martin Space constructed the spacecraft and integrated its systems and the University of Oxford, funded by the UK Space Agency, built the LTM instrument.
While Lunar Trailblazer won’t fulfill its original scientific goals, its development has paved the way for new innovations and partnerships in small-satellite lunar exploration.
Add comment
Comments